Acceptance Test Procedure in RMS

Role

UX Designer (Solo)

Organization

Radisys  

Duration

3 weeks  


98%

Time Reduction


150 → 2

minutes per session


2x

Daily Throughput


50 OLTs

Faster in Year-1

The Problem

Integration engineers spent 150 minutes per OLT commissioning session — manually navigating 20+ screens to screenshot configurations for the Acceptance Test Procedure report.

"I know exactly where every screen is. I still have to click through all of them every single time just to prove the device is configured."

Before - Around 150 minutes

  1. Navigate to OLT device
  2. Open each config section
  3. Screenshot 32 PON ports individually
  4. Screenshot alarms, events, KPIs
  5. Screenshot subscriber list
  6. Compile screenshots into document manually

After - Around 2 to 3 minutes

  1. Open Inventory List
  2. Select OLT → Action menu
  3. Click 'ATP Report'
  4. Report auto-generates
  5. All sections compiled automatically
  6. Download and share
ATP Report – 1
''ATP Report' trigger lives in the action menu on the Inventory List — the screen network engineers open at the start of every session. No new navigation required.

Design Decision

Why Automation and not a navigation redesign?

Research showed engineers weren't lost — they knew every screen. The pain was pure repetition. A navigation redesign would take 6+ months with no guaranteed fix. Automation solved the exact stated problem in weeks.

Solution

One-click report generation from the Inventory List. RMS auto-traverses all configuration screens and compiles the full ATP document in 2–3 minutes.

CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.57.43@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.58.14@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.58.45@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.58.24@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.57.57@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.57.19@2x
CleanShot 2026-02-16 at 13.58.59@2x

Impact

150 minutes → 2–3 minutes

50 OLTs deployed faster in the first year after launch

3 devices in 2 days → 3 devices in 1 day

Engineers described it as a feature they "loved" — rare for internal tooling

If I revisited this

The ATP Report fixes the symptom. The underlying navigation complexity is still there. With more time, I'd run a parallel track — ship the automation as a quick win while beginning a navigation audit to find the remaining 20–30% efficiency gain.

Selected Works

Acceptance Test Procedure in RMSNetwork Management - Enterprise SaaS / B2B
Cross-Channel Fraud Intelligence for BanksFintech - Enterprise SaaS / B2B
Multi-Provider Authentication Message DeliveryInternal Tool - Enterprise SaaS / B2B
Authentication Screen Designer for BanksFintech - Enterprise SaaS / B2B
Usability Testing an AI Sales AssistantAI Platform - Enterprise SaaS / B2B